personal investment blog

The paradoxical results of education for the masses

The paradoxical results of education for the masses

2 Dec 2014

The Churchill wartime government was kicked out by the electorate less than three months after the German surrender in May 1945. Labour won a huge majority and set about a radical socialist programme of nationalisation of key industries and the creation of the NHS and the welfare state. That story is quite well known. What will surprise many people now is that Churchill’s government managed to pass one dramatically progressive piece of parliamentary law in 1944: Rab Butler’s Education Act.

There would be free education for all with selection at the age of 11. Children who passed the 11 Plus were eligible for places in grammar schools – it was intended that the top 25% should reach that standard. Places for the other children were to be offered at either secondary modern schools or technical schools which specialised in scientific and mechanical skills. Sadly technical schools were expensive and hard to staff and there were few set up. This gradually created the impression that the majority of children “failed” at the age of 11 and were sent to schools for underachievers.

The 1944 act also allowed for the creation of comprehensive schools that could incorporate all standards. Perhaps grammar schools were burdened with having been promoted by a Conservative politician, but socialist politicians grew to dislike their perceived elitism and the Wilson governments of the 60s and 70s embarked on a determined programme of abolition. This culminated in an education act in 1976 which stated that state education “is to be provided only in schools where the arrangements for the admission of pupils are not based (wholly or partly) on selection by reference to ability or aptitude.” The class warrior secretary of state for education leading this was Shirley Williams (St Paul’s School for girls and Somerville College, Oxford).

It is a matter of wonder that the most privileged members of the establishment tend to be dismissive of grammar schools and the upwards social mobility that they seem to offer. Our Old Etonian Prime Minister called arguments about grammar schools “splashing around in the shallow end of the educational debate” and “clinging on to outdated mantras that bear no relation to the reality of life”.

You can find any number of academic studies stating that grammar schools do not help poor children. Why is this? The obvious answer is that better off, better informed parents find ways of advancing their offspring and filling the places – they bid up the prices of properties in catchment areas for good schools and they pay private tutors to coach their children for entrance exams. This is surely true. We see it all around us.

The obvious answer would perhaps be to have more grammar schools. Academic studies struggle slightly to counter this. It is difficult simultaneously to argue that privileged children benefit from grammar schools but that grammar schools don’t really confer any benefits but, hell, let’s have a go.

I have seen one argument that says that poor grammar school pupils are no more likely to achieve upward social mobility than poor comprehensive school pupils but (follow closely here) in the rare cases where poor children succeed in achieving upward social mobility, grammar school pupils achieve greater upward social mobility than comprehensive pupils.  Another point made is that grammar school pupils who have gone on to achieve great things are biased, by their own experience, in favour of grammar schools. Chumps. Thank goodness that the rest of us are able to maintain positions of detached logic.  

One of the loudest and most sustained publicly available laughs over the last few decades has been the sight of politicians and other righteous flag bearers espousing one policy for the masses and another for the very tiny minority known as their own children. Shirley Williams herself sent her daughter to a selective (now private) school. Tony Blair, Harriet Harman and Diane Abbott are all high profile Labour politicians who have found themselves unable to consign their own offspring to “bog-standard comprehensives” (a phrase coined by a speech-writer for the last Labour government).

It may seem facile to ask why people favour their own children over yours and mine. It’s human nature, innit? But most of us like to think of ourselves as being supporters of the greater good. It pains us to discover that we are such eclectic idealists. In 2003, Diane Abbott was frank about this: “I had to choose between my reputation, whatever reputation I have for consistency, and my son – and I chose my son.” In fairness to her, in 2010 she told a newspaper that “that school was the making of him”.

I would like to suggest that the wish of some to snuff out selection in education is utterly doomed. Educational idealists seem to think that it is human nature to try to maximise our collective potential. That’s what many economists claim to believe as well, though they tend to be right-wing and to think that we are initially motivated to maximise our personal wealth, thereby maximising collective wealth as a benign by-product. .

George Cooper’s book “Money, Blood and Revolution” points out convincingly that mankind is actually motivated by the Darwinian urge to compete.

“We are instinctively competitive. We measure ourselves and derive our happiness from our relative position to our peers.”

A person being competitive can look as if they are trying to maximise their share of the pie but as Cooper says, what they are really worrying about is how much pie the guy next door has claimed.

When we contemplate our baby children we tend to look for what has been genetically inherited (perhaps subconsciously motivated by a desire to dissipate any doubts about paternity – don’t lie: the thought has occurred to you). First, physical characteristics – he’s got his mother’s eyes, his father’s long legs. Then, as he gets older, personality traits – he has X’s sense of humour, Y’s determination.

As the beloved approaches adolescence, it is inevitable that these observations come with an occasional negative twist. He’s going to need a little nudge, or possibly all the help he can get, to achieve his potential because he has clearly inherited his mother’s aversion to reading and his father’s dislike of homework. We realise that junior is stuck with his genetic dividend. But there is plenty that we can do, perhaps by way of apology.

Parents who are informed and motivated know that they are already keeping up with the game because many children are burdened with parents who are neither. Darwin is kicking in, if I can put it like that. Not everyone can go to the best school and not everyone can be in the top maths set. We know how our children are doing by reference to how their peers are doing.

Parents who can afford to, often pay for private education. Others pay for private coaching to help their children get into competitive state schools. I have heard of private teachers in such demand that they test children prior to agreeing to accept money for coaching them. And the fees that the best private schools charge have risen sharply.

Since 1970, the overall number of children being privately educated has not budged (621,000 according to the ONS). Yet the cost of private education has multiplied even more than the rise in house prices. (Disclosure: my 76x number is based entirely on the “bog-standard” private school that I attended for the first time in 1969-70).

Price multiples

Given that total participation in private education has not risen, 76x is a pretty stunning number. The only rational explanation that I can give for this explosion in valuation is, as ever, relative to what else is on offer. And this can ostensibly be explained by the demise of grammar schools. Bluntly, parents of  children whom they fondly imagine to be clever and sensitive are frightened of delivering their precious babies into the indiscriminate care of the comprehensive system.  

The next chart shows total places at private (non-maintained) and grammar schools since 1970.


In 1964, there were 726,000 grammar school pupils. In 2009 there were 221,000 (from a recorded low of 149,000 in 1981). 

Arguably the point of most concern to competitive parents and children is university entrance. If you pay £15,000 per child per year you will hope that you are buying, at the very least, an informed and competently managed university application. In truth, you silently tell yourself that your loved one is favourably handicapped for life’s race and that admission to a top university is an outcome passionately to be wished for.

Academic, media and political commentators are disapprovingly unanimous that this is the case. It seems that everything they say is designed to push parents to pay up for private education or private coaching while castigating them for doing so.

But facts would appear to be facts. Social mobility, as represented by university admissions, is apparently just not happening.

“Only 7% of children attend private schools, but 17% Russell group university entrants and 34% of Oxbridge entrants have been privately educated.”

Source: Professor Becky Francis and Dr Billy Wong, King’s College London

I find this very surprising. In my experience, university academics tend to lean to the left politically. When I was at Oxford in 1983, the dons could hardly contain their excitement at the emergence of the liberal-left SDP as a new (and as it turned out transient) political force. In 1985, the Oxford dons voted by more than 2 to 1 to reject the customary offer of an honorary degree to the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher. The idea that this lot discriminate in favour of privilege is ridiculous.

Let’s look again at our headline fact. Seven percent of pupils go to non-maintained schools. According to the ONS, that looks about right.


The Independent Schools Council represents around half of the country’s 2600 independent schools. In its 2013 census, it gives a breakdown of private school pupils by age.

At the age of 7 just 4% of pupils are privately educated. By 11, this rises to 6%. By 16 it is nearly 14% and at 17 nearly 16%.

The last time I checked universities do not select pupils at the age of 11. If they do have a bias it is towards students who apply at the age of 17 or 18.

So let’s check that “fact” again. Russell group universities take 17% of their admissions from private schools which account for 16% of potential applicants.

What the hell are these so-called Russell guys thinking of? Do they not realise how much political capital, how many academic theses, how many newspaper columns and how many blasted school fees have been devoted to the worship of their inherent and irretrievable bias?  

Look, I think we had better keep this between ourselves. It could cause a lot of damage if that got out. 

This is an investment blog. Buying your child an education is supposed to be an investment, though it’s outcome can never reliably be measured (because you will never know how they would have fared without it). Advantages in terms of university entrance are less clear than the opponents of private education claim. One wonders why they don’t change their tune and point out, as I do, that it can easily be a huge financial outlay for little or no return. It may well be that they treasure the moral high ground in what passes for a class war.  

Saloon bar economics would suggest that the rise in demand for private school places as illustrated by a 76x increase in the cost would result in an increase in supply. But as we have seen, there are no more places than there were in 1970. So, a paradoxical result of universal education is that some of the parents of 621,000 children seem to be buying education for reasons other than education. Its exclusivity, despised by its opponents, makes it a kind of luxury good.  

If the price of a loaf had kept up with the cost of private education since 1970, it would now cost £6.84. Paying for your kids’ education may deliver uncertain benefits but it sure implies that you gotta lotta bread. 



  1. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

  2. Reading your site is pure pleasure for me, it deserves to go viral,
    you need some initial traffic only. If you want to know how to get it search for:
    blackhatworren’s strategies

  3. Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog.
    Is it tough to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast.

    I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you
    have any tips or suggestions? Many thanks

    Feel free to visit my webpage … shopping blog; Shauna,

  4. I’m curious to find out what blog platform you have been working with?

    I’m experiencing some small security issues with my latest site and I
    would like to find something more safe. Do you have any suggestions?

    My blog post: business advice

  5. 訪問します










  6. Aw, this was an incredibly nice post. Taking the time and actual effort to
    produce a good article… but what can I say… I hesitate
    a whole lot and don’t manage to get nearly
    anything done.

  7. Wonderful items from you, man. I have take note your stuff prior
    to and you are simply too wonderful. I really like what you’ve received here, certainly like
    what you’re stating and the best way during which you say it.
    You’re making it entertaining and you continue
    to take care of to keep it smart. I can’t wait to learn much more from you.
    That is actually a great website.

    Here is my web-site :: home blog

  8. Right now it seems like BlogEngine is the best blogging platform available right now.
    (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re usiing
    on your blog?

  9. Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you
    download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my
    blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Thanks

    Also visit my blog post :: business

  10. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading
    it, you are a great author. I will make certain to bookmark your blog and will often come back
    in the future. I want to encourage you continue your great work, have a nice holiday weekend!

  11. Have you used blog sites for SEO? I got told they are meant to be the best but not sure if they have any benefitpost panda
    The paradoxical results of education for the masses – The
    newest addition to my weekly read

  12. 老人ホーム、サービス付き高齢者向け住宅、介護療養型医療施設、高齢者専用賃貸住宅などの高齢者の施設撰びは、自らの力で生活ができる賃貸のようなタイプや寝たきりで介錯が必要と「自立」「要支援」「要介護」の条件によって入居する施設によって違ってきます。

  13. It is really a great and useful piece of information. I’m glad that you just shared this helpful information with us.
    Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

    Check out my blog post :: seo

  14. Hello everyone, it’s my first pay a visit at this site, and piece of writing is truly
    fruitful for me, keep up posting these types of content.

    my page; shopping blog

  15. What’s up, I check your blogs daily. Your humoristic style is awesome, keep doing what you’re

    Feel free to visit my homepage :: home blog

  16. I like the valuable information you provide
    in your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and check
    again here regularly. I am quite sure I will learn many new stuff right
    here! Good luck for the next!

    my blog post: shopping blog

  17. Its such as you learn my thoughts! You seem to understand
    a lot approximately this, like you wrote the guide
    in it or something. I think that you simply can do with a few percent
    to power the message home a little bit, however other than that, this is
    magnificent blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back.

    Have a look at my web page home blog

  18. This website is really interesting, but why it is on 18th
    place in google’s search results. It deserves to
    be in top 5. Many webmasters think that seo is dead in 2016,
    but it is not true. There is sneaky method to reach google’s top 5 that not
    many people know. Simply search for: pandatsor’s tools

  19. If you are going for most excellent contents like myself, simply visit this
    web site every day for the reason that it provides feature
    contents, thanks

    My web page :: seo

  20. Very good info. Lucky me I ran across your website by accident (stumbleupon).
    I’ve book marked it for later!

  21. I must say you have very interesting content here. Your website can go viral.

    You need initial boost only. How to get it? Search for: Etorofer’s strategies

  22. Amazing blog! Do you have any recommendations for aspiring writers?
    I’m hoping to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress
    or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that
    I’m totally overwhelmed .. Any ideas? Kudos!

  23. 脇の臭いでお悩みの方にグッドニュースです。





  24. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes
    which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and
    visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to
    create your theme? Exceptional work!

    Feel free to surf to my page: business marketing

  25. Can I simply just say what a comfort to find someone that actually understands what they are discussing on the internet.
    You definitely know how to bring a problem to light and make
    it important. More and more people ought
    to check this out and understand this side of the story.
    It’s surprising you’re not more popular because
    you most certainly have the gift.

    my web blog – business advice

Leave a Reply